created Jun 17, 2008 by todd
7 responses
Is there any way this can be true. . o O (scratches head).
As Republicans go, Hagel would be a good choice. He is strongly against the current administration, and the Iraq war. Also agains the NSA wiretapping. Strong foreign policy experience, and would free up a Republican seat in the Senate.
As a strongly Partisan Democrat I would probably be against it, but I don't really have a logical reason why.
nice admission, smkenzie23.
I'm guessing if I dig into his record on social issues it would be bad, but that is a guess.
Quoting wikipedia: "In October 2002, Hagel voted in favor of authorizing the use of military force against Iraq."
Damn, he's as bad as Clinton... and it looks like he is anti-gay, anti-choice and anti-environment.
Once registered, you can create your own stories. Click on the Post button to get started.